Supporting gun ownership and sportsmen's rights in response to the flurry of anti-gun and sport legislation under consideration in Congress and the Illinois State Legislature.
Upcoming Events
This includes events for most of the clubs listed under our "clubs" section.
(We're trying to cover Northern Illinois and Southern Wisconsin - anything about about 2 hours by car.)
(If you would like to include your organization or events on our calendar, please contact us and we'll accommodate you)
Salute To Nick Provenzano Thursday, September 18th 5pm – 7:30pm
As Chairman of the Law & Justice Committee of the McHenry County Board, Nick Provenzano has led the fight in
support of the 2nd Amendment and gun owner’s rights. His recent leadership to introduce the Pro 2nd Amendment
Resolution led to a unanimous vote of support by all 24 county board members of our gun owners rights. Nick’s
leadership came at a difficult time in Northern Illinois and came prior to the Supreme Court ruling upholding 2nd
Amendment rights to individual citizens. Nick stood up to Chicago politicians and the Governor at a time when it wasn’t
politically correct.
Now Nick needs our help as he faces an Anti-gun Democrat challenger for his County Board seat in the fall election. This
opponent will surely use Nick’s defense of 2nd Amendment Rights as a tool to rally the Anti-gun radicals to defeat Nick in November. We can’t let that happen and now is our time to come together to help Nick’s campaign.
Please join with the Sportsman’s Association at a fundraising dinner on Nick’s behalf on September 18.
$30 per person Dinner & Cash Bar
McHenry VFW Post 4600
3002 W. Rte. 120 McHenry, IL
Pasadena, Texas resident Joe Horn was protecting his neighbors posession when the robbers allegedly charged him, forcing him to defend himself with his shotgun.
Just got in from seeing David Diaz get crushed by Manny Pacquiao and thought I'd scan the news really fast... While skimming, I came across this opinion piece in the LA Times:
How gun makers can help us Make firearms manufacturers figure out how to reduce the 12,000 shooting deaths each year.
Gun manufacturers insist that these deaths are not their fault, preferring to pin the blame on criminals and irresponsible dealers. They have fiercely resisted even minimal restrictions on sales and have simultaneously washed their hands of responsibility for this "collateral damage."
...
We propose a new way to prod gun makers to reduce gun deaths, one that would be unlikely to put them out of business or to prevent law-abiding citizens from obtaining guns. By using a strategy known as "performance-based regulation," we would deputize private actors -- the gun makers -- to deal with the negative effects of their products in ways that promote the public good.
You. Have. Got. To. Be. Kidding. Me... Right? This is wrong on so many levels, but I'll just pick one point:
Why would gun-makers agree to "performance-based" solutions where a government agency assesses penalty based on a manufacturers "share of the blame" when makers are already immune to civil prosecution from the consequences of a criminal's actions?
Tribune reporter Dawn Turner Trice offers her insight regarding yesterday's landmark Supreme Court ruling in a op-ed "Repeal the 2nd Amendment". She offers her scholarly - but, as of yesterday, wholy misguided - view that, "The amendment was intended to protect the authority of the states to organize militias."
What irks me the most, however, is that Turner Tice, a civil rights advocate - just not for your 2nd Amendment civil right - feels that it is fit for any one group in an area to trump the rights of another group if they possess a majority in an that area. Isn't that what lead to part of what lead to that pickle known as the Civil War and the 1960's Civil Rights Movement?
One last thing that I feel compelled to address is her statement, "Citizens have had the right to protect themselves in their homes with other weapons, such as shotguns."
First, by following her logic, if citizens are allowed to own shotgun and guns are the problem, then why aren't shotgun crimes being decried by Chicago Mayor Daley? Oh yeah, it comes back to the fact that law-abiding gun owners aren't really the problem.
Second, the truth is that not everyone can handle a shotgun, even a small one like a .410 or a 28 Ga.: the elderly or infirm folks may be able to better control a small handgun. Regardless, law-abiding folks should have the right and the freedom to choose whatever tool works best for their needs!
Following Thursday’s (5-4) ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller that the Second Amendment protects an individual civil right to keep and bear arms, and that a municipal gun ban violates that right, the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and the Illinois State Rifle Association (ISRA) filed a federal lawsuit (complaint) challenging the City of Chicago’s long-standing handgun ban.
“Chicago’s handgun ban has failed to stop violent crime,” SAF founder Alan Gottlieb stated. “It’s time to give the Constitution a chance.”
Case has been filed this morning after the SCOTUS decision was announced!
Again, we hear those tired old "Wild West" arguments, which haven't exactly happend in the 48 other states that actually have concealed carry, nevermind that the SCOTUS ruling just addressed the question of the Second Amendment being an individual right and if people could keep gun in their own homes.
The US Supreme Court released it's ruling today affirming that the right to keep and bear arms is an indvidual right. The decision can be read by following this link. (PDF)
Let the backpedalling begin! Obama "Disavows" statements on DC case. While were on the subject: Amazing that a Constitutional Law teacher was so clueless about the meaning of rights.
Interesting that the votes were pretty much along partisan lines.
Working people frequently ask retired people what they do to make theirdaysinteresting.
Well, for example, the other day I went downtown and into a shop.I was only there for about 5 minutes, and when I came out, there was a copwriting out a parking ticket.
I said to him, 'Come on, man, how about giving a retired person a break'?
He ignored meand continued writing the ticket.I called him a 'Nazi.'
He glared at me and wrote another ticket for having worn tires.So I called him a 'doughnut eatingGestapo.'
He finished the second ticket and put it on the windshield with the first.
Then he wrote a third ticket. This went on for about 20 minutes.
Personally, I didn't care. I came downtown on the bus, and the car that hewasputting the tickets on had a bumper sticker that said, 'Obama in '08 .'
I found this excellent commentary, courtesy of Xavier. Watch this video, then read below.
Each Presidential candidate is apparently in the dark regarding the "Gun Show Loophole." The imagery is deceptive. They are lying. Know what? There is no gun show loophole. At gun shows, the transfer of firearms must meet the exact same stringent criteria as in any other place in the state or municipality in which the gun show is being held.
What these politicians are advocating is preventing the private transfer of property between two private citizens. When a person owns a piece of property for their own use, be it a lawn mower, a wedding ring, a sofa and ottoman, a cord of firewood, or a gun, the state has no right or ability to regulate that transfer.
Closing the gun show loophole is not about preventing criminals from getting guns. Criminals steal guns through burglary. Criminals buy and barter for guns on the street from other criminals. Why? Because they are cheaper that way. What criminal wants to pay a fair market price for a gun when he can steal one or swap some crack for one?
No.....the gun show loophole fallacy is about two things.
1. It prevents honest citizens from rightfully buying and selling private property.
2. It gives politicians a talking point so they can look tough on crime to ignorant constituents.
Don't believe everything you hear.
I'll add some comments here too - In Illinois, private transfers between two FOID holders are legal, as the FOID is proof of character and background check.
(Note: This was written by Breda, of the blog, "The Breda Fallacy". It was first posted in October of 2007 and subsequently re-posted by the Buckeye Firearms Association.)
They've found a body in the woods. Again. Another missing girl,
woman, sister, mother, friend strangled, stabbed, shot, raped,
mutilated, dismembered and tossed in the brush, in a ditch, beside
railroad tracks, in a dumpster, in the ocean like so much garbage. The
details don't really matter. They were all guilty of nothing more than
perhaps smiling at the wrong man, speaking to the wrong stranger, being
at the wrong place at the wrong time, not being wary enough while going
about their daily lives, not realizing that they were prey, that
someone was watching them, following them and thinking violent thoughts
about them.
The photographs their loved ones give to the police are all eerily
similar..a sideways smile, a dream behind the eyes. They could be me,
or you, your best friend, your neighbor or your mother. And then the
body is found and the coroner talks about needing dental records, about
decomposition, about DNA. I can never get over the horror of it, those
women, their thoughts and hopes and precious temples of flesh so
quickly turned to nothing but scraps of meat and bones and if never
found, nothing. Forgotten, except for the whispered hometown legends
about the girl who got lost, disappeared without a trace.
How fragile we are.
Every time I hear another one of these stories, I decide that this
will never happen to me. That I will not be a victim. A man will never
understand the fear a woman has walking across a dark parking lot
alone. How it may be a risky thing to take a walk by yourself around
your own neighborhood. How no amount of judo or karate will make a
difference if you are a small female person and there's a large male
person who's running after you or, God forbid, has gotten close enough
to put his hands on you.
I have two defenses. #1, listen to that internal warning alarm and
pay attention to my surroundings and the people in it. #2, get my
concealed carry permit. I'm halfway there.
"Abe Lincoln may have freed all men, but Sam Colt made them equal."
Women, this is for you too. Don't be afraid of protecting yourself. You really are worth it.
Chicago Tribune: Of course it's fair that they have guns and you don't!
Trib columnist John Kass wieghs in on Chicago-style clout, err "gun control":
But what's not often reported by the decidedly pro-gun-control media is thatsince Chicago's anti-handgun law went into effect in 1982, only two classes of people have had ready access to firearms:
Armed and Safe recently wrote about Mark Kirk's newly introduced legislation, H.R. 6257, calling for a new ban on semi-automatic rifles. AR-15's, FAL's, etc are all named.
Jesse Jackson came and went on June 15th. He was protesting the empty DSA factory. (They get weekends off...)
Did anyone notice? We sure didn't. Some of us participated in the McHenry Co. VFW's Flag Day celebration and my family was busy enjoying a pre-Father's Day BBQ on a nice sunny summer day.
The media hardly covered it too... Almost nobody, outside of Father Pfleger and Mayor Daley that is, cared too much to comment.
I wouldn't post anything, except that I ran across this excerpt from Lake County Sheriff Mark Curran in the Lake Co. News-Sun:
In a statement that noted his office spent $5,200 providing security at an August 2007 protest outside D.S. Arms, 27 W. 900 Industrial Ave., Curran suggested it would be more beneficial to find alternative solutions to curb random acts of violence involving guns.
'We've Lost the Battle on What the 2nd Amendment Means,' Brady Campaign Head Says
"We've lost the battle on what the Second Amendment means," campaign president Paul Helmke told ABC News. "Seventy-five percent of the public thinks it's an individual right. Why are we arguing a theory anymore? We are concerned about what we can do practically."
"We're expecting D.C. to lose the case," Helmke said. "But this could be good from the standpoint of the political-legislative side."
If the Supreme Court strikes down the D.C. gun ban, the Brady Campaign is hoping that it will reorient gun control groups around more limited measures that will be harder to cast as infringements of the Second Amendment.
"The NRA [National Rifle Association] won't have this fear factor," Helmke said.
We're sad to hear that Linda Kovalik has decided to move to Alaska, but we totally understand why... But, is it wrong to keep our fingers and toes crossed, hoping for some Moose-steaks or Salmon fillets?!
Best of luck on the move and in the Great White North! You will be missed!
Eighth-grader charged as adult for bringing gun to school
A 15-year-old has been charged as an adult for bringing a gun to his Southeast
Side elementary school on Monday. The gun was not discharged and no one was
injured.